Legal Opinion

Bank for Savings & Trusts v. Jefferson Development Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 27, 1937No. 6 Div. 39PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Chief Justice.

As we understand, the bill of complaint as last amended is not a statutory bill to quiet title, but is by one in possession to cancel certain instruments of rec-cord as being invalid, but which show the legal title to the land to be in the respondent and which requires evidence aliunde to show the invalidity of said instruments. King v. Artman, 225 Ala. 569, 144 So. 442, and many cases there cited. Hence, the argument that the bill does not conform to the statutory requirements, section 9905 of the Code of 1923, is inapt.

The case of City of Bessemer v. Schanz, 226 Ala.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. King v. ArtmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  2. Burnwell Coal Co. v. SetzerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  3. Morris v. 1st National BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  4. Freeman v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  5. McEntire, Wagnon & Thomas Co. v. Rock Hill Buggy Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Winston v. WinstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
  2. Barksdale v. JordanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  3. Stone v. LacySupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  4. Winston v. WinstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API