Legal Opinion

Buchmann Abstract & Investment Co. v. Roberts

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 15, 1925No. 1 Div. 344PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

Statutory bill to quiet title filed in April, 1916, by appellee against appellant. Section- 9905 et seq., Code 1923. Under this statute this court has repeatedly held that in order to maintain the bill the proof must show a peaceable possession in the complainant as contradistinguished from a contested’, disputed, or scrambling possession. Randle v. Daughrill, 142 Ala. 400, 39 So. 162; Wood Lumber Co. v. Williams, 157 Ala. 73, 47 So. 202; Ladd v. Powell, 144 Ala. 408, 39 So. 46; Cent. of Ga. R. Co. v. Rouse, 176 Ala. 138, 57 So. 706.

To constitute a contested, disputed or scrambling…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. George E. Wood Lumber Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  2. Ladd v. PowellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1905
  3. Central of Georgia Railroad v. RouseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  4. Donohoo v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  5. Crabtree v. Alabama Land Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1908

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Grayson v. MuckleroySupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  2. Chestang v. Tensaw Land & Timber CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  3. Montgomery v. SpearsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  4. Ford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  5. Hinds v. SlackSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API