Legal Opinion

Gilbert, R. v. Synagro Central Aplts

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 21, 2015No. 121 MAP 2014PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice EAKIN.

In this appeal, we are asked to determine whether a trial court or a jury should determine the applicability of § 954(a) of the Right to Farm Act (RTFA), 3 P.S. §§ 951-957, which precludes nuisance actions against farms under certain circumstances, and whether the trial court in the instant case properly concluded the land application of biosolids as fertilizer is a “normal agricultural operation,” rendering § 954(a) applicable. We hold § 954(a) is a statute of repose; its applicability, as determined by statutory interpretation, is a question of law for courts to decide.…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Murphy v. Duquesne University of Holy GhostSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Bowling v. Office of Open RecordsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Atcovitz v. Gulph Mills Tennis Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Commonwealth v. ShifflerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Cochran v. GAF Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Dubose, R. v. Willowcrest Nur. Home, Aplts.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. In Re: Adoption of: L.B.M., A MinorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Trust Agrmt. of E. Taylor Appeal of: Wells FargoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. Consolidated Reports & Return by the Tax Claims Bureau of Northumberland County of PropertiesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Starling v. Lake Meade Property Owners Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API