Legal Opinion

Chowan County v. . Commissioner of Banks

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 27, 1932PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ClahKSON, J".

The question involved: Under the circumstances of this case did the Commissioner of Revenue, after the assessment was regularly made and no appeal taken in accordance with the statute, have authority to strike out an assessment of the value of the “corporate excess” of the capital stock of the Citizens Bank, made by the State Board of Assessment and certified to Chowan County, and thereby prevent the collection of taxes levied thereon by the county? We think not.

Sections 600 and 603 of the Machinery Act of 1929 (Public Laws 1929, chap. 344), provide the method by which the State…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Interstate Commerce Commission v. United States Ex Rel. Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. R. R. v. . ReidSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  3. Southern Railway Co. v. Cherokee CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  4. Markham v. . CarverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  5. Norfolk Southern Railroad v. ForbesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Blue Ridge Electric Membership Corp. v. Grannis Bros.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. McLean v. MathenySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Rockingham v. . Hood, Comr.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  4. Hood Ex Rel. Planters Bank & Trust Co. v. McGillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  5. TOWN OF MATTHEWS v. WrightCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API