Legal Opinion

Hood Ex Rel. Planters Bank & Trust Co. v. McGill

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 28, 1934PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBbogden, J.

A bank, owning tbe land upon which tbe bank building was situate, closed its doors and tbe Commissioner of Banks took possession for purposes of liquidation by virtue of tbe statute. At tbe time of closing there was an outstanding mortgage securing an indebtedness of $25,000, all of which was unpaid and in default. Tbe mortgagee took possession of tbe real estate and collected tbe rents and thereafter tbe liquidating agent of tbe bank listed tbe real property for taxation. County and town taxes were duly assessed and subsequently tbe mortgagee duly exercised tbe power of sale and became tbe…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harper v. . BattleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  2. West v. RosenbergCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  3. Stone v. . PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  4. Chowan County v. . Commissioner of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  5. Rockingham v. . Hood, Comr.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Martin v. Ray Lackey Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API