Rockingham v. . Hood, Comr.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtOlaeksoN, J.
The questions involved: (1) Is the bank stock tax of North Carolina a tax on the shares of stock to be paid by the stockholders or by the bank itself? We think by the bank. (2) Can the taxing units require the liquidator of an insolvent bank to pay such tax duly levied before the bank was closed? "We think so.
Public Laws of 1929, chap. 344, Art. YI, sec. 600, subsec. 6, is as follows: “The taxes assessed upon the shares of stock of any such banking association, institution or trust companies shall be paid by the cashier, secretary, treasurer, or other officer or officers thereof, and in the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- National Bank v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Minot v. Philadelphia, Wilmington & Baltimore RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Board of Commissioners v. Blackwell Durham Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
- Garysburg Manufacturing Co. v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- Attorney General v. Bank of Cape FearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1847
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- School District of Lansing v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Hood Ex Rel. Planters Bank & Trust Co. v. McGillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Virginia-Carolina Joint Stock Land Bank of Norfolk v. Board of County Commissioners of Pasquotank CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934