Legal Opinion

McLean v. Matheny

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 20, 1954No. 307PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeNNY, J.

It would seem to be unfortunate that this action has not been disposed of heretofore on its merits. However, we are bound by the record now before us and may consider only the question of law presented for determination.

This appeal turns on whether the cause of action against the .corporate defendant dates from the time summons was issued and served upon it, or whether such service relates back to the commencement of the action.

Ordinarily, under the comprehensive power to amend process and pleadings where the proper party is before the court, although under a wrong name, an amendment will be…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Plemmons v. Southern Improvement Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  2. Hogsed v. . PearlmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. Bailey v. McPhersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. Jones v. . VanstorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  5. Clevenger v. . GroverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Harris v. MareadySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  2. Wiles v. Welparnel Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. Piland v. Hertford County Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  4. Russell v. BEA STAPLE MANUFACTURING COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. Crawford v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API