State v. Bevan
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
*535ORTEGA, J.
Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction for driving while under the influence of intoxicants (DUII), ORS 813.010.1 On appeal, defendant makes eight assignments of error. We reject without discussion defendant’s other assignments of error and write to address only the admission of certain scientific evidence, namely, testimony by a police officer concerning the vertical gaze nystagmus (VGN) test. We review for errors of law. State v. Hernandez, 227 Or App 319, 321, 206 P3d 197 (2009). Because we conclude that the evidence concerning the VGN test should not have been admitted…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. O'KeyOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. SampsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- State v. PerryOregon Supreme Court · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. WhitmoreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- State v. BranchCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- State v. KochCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- State v. ZielinskiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.