Legal Opinion

State v. Koch

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 3, 2014No. CR1112062; A151401PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, C. J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII), ORS 813.010. Defendant argues that the trial court (1) erred in denying his motion to suppress urinalysis test results that were obtained after officers violated defendant’s rights under Article I, section 12, of the Oregon Constitution, and (2) committed plain error by imposing a $255 conviction fee pursuant to ORS 813.030. We reach the first assignment of error only; the nature of our disposition obviates any need to consider the second assignment of error. As explained below, we conclude that,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 2005

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. Heise-FayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  2. State v. DodgeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  3. State v. BeesonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  4. State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  5. State v. SwanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API