Legal Opinion
In Re Shaw
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 6, 1939No. Crim. 3207PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This is a petition for writ of habeas corpus on behalf of the two applicants, who were convicted of a violation of the provisions of section 113 of the Penal Code of this state. This petition is based upon the claim that the freeholders’ charter of the city of Los Angeles has super seeled such section 113 of the Penal Code, in that section 118 of article IX of said charter (Stats. 1925, p. 1068) provides as follows:
“Any officer or other person who shall wilfully or corruptly, by himself or in co-operation with one or more other persons, defeat, deceive or obstruct any person in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Nicholl v. KosterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Robert v. Police Court of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1905
- Jackson v. BaehrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Farmer v. BehmerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
- Griffin v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
3Cited by5 opinions
- Boyle v. City of BendOregon Supreme Court · 1963
- People v. EvansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Lines v. City of MilwaukieCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- Lines v. City of MilwaukieCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports1995