Legal Opinion

Griffin v. City of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 1, 1933No. Docket No. 8023PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.

In an action against the City of Los Angeles, based upon seven alleged causes of action, general and special demurrers were sustained as to four thereof, and after a trial without a jury upon the first, second and seventh causes of action, findings and judgment were rendered in favor of the defendant, from which the plaintiff appealed.

The city council of said city, pursuant to the commission of a homicide during the robbery of a bank, enacted an ordinance wherein they recited that “the presence in the City of Los Angeles of the persons, and each of them, who committed the crime hereinabove…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Ex Parte DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Coats v. CoatsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. People v. RuefCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  4. Fragley v. PhelanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Baumgartner v. HastyIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Laisne v. California State Board of OptometryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. West Coast Advertising Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Brown v. ArbuckleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. In Re ShawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. Brite v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API