Farmer v. Behmer
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
This is an action to obtain a decree permanently enjoining and prohibiting defendant from leasing or renting, or permitting the premises described in the complaint to be leased, occupied or used as a bawdy-house, a house of prostitution or ill-fame or a disorderly house, and for damages.
Plaintiff had judgment as prayed for and for $25 and for plaintiff’s costs. Defendant appeals from the judgment on bill of exceptions.
The court found that plaintiff is and “for more than four years last past has been the owner of the premises and dwelling-house” described in the complaint and situated in the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. Gold Run Ditch & Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1884
- Fisher v. ZumwaltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Chateau v. SinglaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Pon v. WittmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Demartini v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Professional Fire Fighters, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Boreta Enterprises, Inc. v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- In Re WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Miracle Adhesives Corp. v. Peninsula Tile Contractors' Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Weis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.