Riley v. Roach
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Oceana; Sessions, J. Case by Luke Riley against William Roach for per» sonal injuries. A judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by the court is reviewed by plaintiff on writ of error.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
This is an action on the case to recover damages for an injury received by the plaintiff on July 28, 1909, by reason of an alleged collision of defendant’s automobile with the plaintiff’s buggy, in which he was riding on a highway.
The declaration consists of two counts. In the first count the plaintiff alleges as follows:
“And which automobile of said defendant was then and there under the care, direction, and supervision of a certain then servant, to wit, one Hall, a chauffeur, of the said defendant, who was then and there driving the same in and along the highways in said county and State by…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ritchie v. WallerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
- Steffen v. McNaughtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
- Moon v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
- Hartley v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Patterson v. Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1884
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Linville v. . NissenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Hamed v. Wayne CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 2011
- Moore v. PalmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Brinkman v. ZuckermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Nelson v. Stutz Chicago Factory Branch, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1930
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.