Cameron v. Burke
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Tallman, J., entered March 10, 1910, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action for breach of covenant.
1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.
Respondent brought this action to recover for breach of a covenant of quiet enjoyment, contained in a *204deed from appellants to himself. The property described in the deed is “lots 1, 2, and 3 in block 18, B. F. Day’s Eldorado addition to the city of Seattle.” After the delivery of the deed, and the enjoyment of possession thereunder by respondent, the state, through its board of state land commissioners, platted Lake Union shore lands, lots 1, 2 and 3, block 96, of which plat overlaps a portion of the area claimed by respondent under his deed from appellants, which gave respondent the option…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gifford v. HortonWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Shorett v. SignorWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- West Coast Manufacturing & Investment Co. v. West Coast Improvement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1903
- Dygert v. PlettsNew York Supreme Court · 1841
- Laub v. . BuckmillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Stern v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Black v. BartoWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- DeVilliers v. Pioneer Abstract & Loan Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923