Legal Opinion

Black v. Barto

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1911No. 9915PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Ronald J., entered June 27, 1911, in favor of the plaintiffs, after a trial before the court without a jury, in an action for breach of covenant.

1Opinion of the CourtGose, J.

— In March, 1903, the defendant, Ella Barto, and her husband, since deceased, conveyed certain real property situate in King county to the plaintiffs. The deed of conveyance contained a covenant for the quiet enjoyment of the property. The purchasers thereafter sold and conveyed the property by deeds of warranty. Thereafter, at the suit of one Edward Collins, a decree was entered adjudging him to be the owner of an undivided one-fourth interest in the property. The judgment was affirmed upon appeal. Horton v. Barto, 57 Wash. 477, 107 Pac. 191, 135 Am. St. 999. The plaintiffs thereupon…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. West Coast Manufacturing & Investment Co. v. West Coast Improvement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Horton v. BartoWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Eversole v. EarlySupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
  4. Cameron v. BurkeWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Jackson v. McAuleyWashington Supreme Court · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Foley v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  2. Hoyt v. RotheWashington Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API