Legal Opinion

DeVilliers v. Pioneer Abstract & Loan Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 3, 1923No. 11292PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RAY, C.

In an action against an abstracter and his bondsmen for damages for leaving out of an abstract an entry of a mining lease, the plaintiffs recovered nominal damages only, and bring tho case here by petition in error and case-made.

After a careful examination of tho evidence and the very able brief of counsel, we are of the opinion that there is but one question to be determined and that is the proper measure of damages.

The facts, as claimed by the plaintiffs, are these: The Indian department was advertising to sell a 40-acre tract of Indian land adjoining the old town of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Keuthan v. St. Louis Trust Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. Cameron v. BurkeWashington Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Perkio v. PrunierSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API