Legal Opinion

Harding v. Harding

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 9, 1899PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Bill for Separate Maintenance,—Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Richard W. Clifford, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Windes.

after making the foregoing statement, delivered the opinion of the court.

There are assigned on the record in this case by appellant one hundred and fourteen errors and thirty-four cross-errors by appellee. The needless repetitions, over and over again, by appellant’s counsel, in his briefs and arguments, of his points and of the evidence which he claims sustains them, have caused us a great amount of unnecessary labor. The arguments also are largely made up of long quotations from, the abstract, which is wholly unnecessary and of no assistance to the court.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Plaster v. PlasterIllinois Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Zilley v. DunwiddieWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  3. City of Belleville v. Citizens' Horse Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Smith v. BrittenhamIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Stewartson v. StewartsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1853

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Harding v. HardingSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Harding v. Standard Oil Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois · 1910
  3. Harden v. HardenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  4. Harding v. HardingAppellate Court of Illinois · 1903
  5. Harding v. HardingIllinois Supreme Court · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API