Legal Opinion

Smith v. Brittenham

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1878PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of DeWitt county; the Hon. Lyman Lacey, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott

On the 12th day of January, 1869, Sarah J. Brittenham, who was the owner in fee simple, conveyed the lands in controversy to Columbus C. Smith, and this bill was filed by her to set aside the conveyance, because of the fraud, as she alleges, practiced upon her to induce the making of the deed. It is charged, the lands were sold to defendant for $14,000, to be paid for by a stock of goods, to be delivered to complainant’s husband, since deceased, at invoice prices; and the difference either way was to be made up by the party against whom it should be found to exist. An invoice was made,…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Harding v. HardingIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Smith v. BrittenhamIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Heffron v. RiceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1893
  4. Thrifts v. FritzIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Harding v. HardingAppellate Court of Illinois · 1899

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API