Legal Opinion
McLean v. Plastics, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 3, 1985No. C1-85-1242PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
Gary McLean appeals from a determination by the Commissioner of Economic Security that he was not entitled to a remand for purposes of reconsidering whether he was discharged by his employer for misconduct. We affirm.
FACTS
Gary McLean was employed by Plastics, Inc. as a maintenance mechanic from November 1966 until March 11, 1985, when he was discharged for excessive tardiness. He filed a claim for unemployment compensation benefits, alleging that much of his tardiness had been caused by a work-related injury, and that he had only been two minutes late on his last day of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Tilseth v. Midwest Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- White v. Metropolitan Medical CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co., Ltd.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Moeller v. Minnesota Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Smith v. American Indian Chemical Dependency Diversion ProjectCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- McCourtney v. Imprimis Technology, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- Gerr v. Target-FridleyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- McCourtney v. Imprimis Technology, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- McCourtney v. Imprimis Technology, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991