Gerr v. Target-Fridley
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LESLIE, Judge.
This is an appeal from a determination that respondent’s absences due to illness did not constitute “misconduct” for purposes of the unemployment compensation laws. We affirm.
FACTS
Respondent Mary Gerr was hired by relator Target-Fridley in 1969. She has a medical condition known as “hives” (in medical terms “urticaria”), which at various times incapacitates her. Her supervisor was aware of this problem, and in November 1983 Gerr brought in a medical disability statement which documented her condition and indicated that the hives could cause her to miss work from time to…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Boynton Cab Co. v. NeubeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
- Tilseth v. Midwest Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- White v. Metropolitan Medical CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co., Ltd.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Moeller v. Minnesota Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.