Legal Opinion

Gerr v. Target-Fridley

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 18, 1986No. C8-85-1982Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LESLIE, Judge.

This is an appeal from a determination that respondent’s absences due to illness did not constitute “misconduct” for purposes of the unemployment compensation laws. We affirm.

FACTS

Respondent Mary Gerr was hired by relator Target-Fridley in 1969. She has a medical condition known as “hives” (in medical terms “urticaria”), which at various times incapacitates her. Her supervisor was aware of this problem, and in November 1983 Gerr brought in a medical disability statement which documented her condition and indicated that the hives could cause her to miss work from time to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Boynton Cab Co. v. NeubeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Tilseth v. Midwest Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  3. White v. Metropolitan Medical CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  4. Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co., Ltd.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  5. Moeller v. Minnesota Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API