Legal Opinion

United States v. David Eugene Berrier

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided March 8, 1971No. 14400_1PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BOREMAN, Circuit Judge:

David Eugene Berrier appeals from his conviction in the district court without a jury for knowingly failing and neglecting to report for civilian employment to which he had been assigned by his local Selective Service board in lieu of induction into military service.

After being classified 1-0 (conscientious objector opposed to combat and noncombat service), Berrier on three separate occasions was given an opportunity by his local board to select the type of civilian work which he wished to perform. Included among the choices offered Berrier were maintenance work,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Selective Draft Law CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. United States v. Armand Fred Hoepker, United States of America v. Walter Gail Thomas, United States of America v. Edward L. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
  3. Victor Langston Langhorne v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  4. United States v. William Crosby Crouch, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  5. David Leroy Daniels v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lawton v. TarrDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API