Legal Opinion

Victor Langston Langhorne v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 29, 1968No. 21910PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a selective service case. Appellant, claiming to be a conscientious objector (Class 1-0) and also claiming a ministerial exemption (Class IV-D), was classified as a conscientious objector and ordered to report for civilian employment contributing to the maintenance of the national health, safety and interest. 1 He refused and was subsequently indicted, tried and convicted of a violation of 50 U.S.C. App. § 462(a). He appeals on the ground that his claim for exemption as a minister was improperly denied and that the work to which he was assigned was inappropriate.

The board acted within…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Parrott v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  2. YRIBARNE v. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Richard Arlen Badger v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  4. Robert James Lingo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. Wayne Lee CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  2. United States v. William Crosby Crouch, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  3. Danny Roy Shoemaker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  4. David Leroy Daniels v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  5. United States v. Louis Edward BurguenoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API