Legal Opinion

United States v. Armand Fred Hoepker, United States of America v. Walter Gail Thomas, United States of America v. Edward L. Smith

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 14, 1955No. 11346_1PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LINDLEY, Circuit Judge.

Defendants were adjudged guilty as charged in separate indictments of violating the Universal Military Training and Service Act, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 451 et seq., in that each had refused to perform certain civilian work to which he had been assigned by his local board.

The facts in all three cases are essentially the same. Each defendant, on his application, was classified I-O, (conscientiously opposed to participation in war), by his local board. This classification obligated him to perform, in lieu of military service, civilian work “contributing to the maintenance…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Selective Draft Law CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. United States v. NilesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1954
  3. United States v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1954
  4. United States v. SutterDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1954
  5. United States v. ThomasDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1954

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Emil Yaich v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  2. United States v. Wallace Delaney MohammedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1961
  3. United States v. MendozaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1969
  4. United States v. Robert Vernon Manns, United States of America v. William Everett ThomanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1956
  5. Burl Melton Howze v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API