Legal Opinion

Seban v. Dade County

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 14, 1958PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THORNAL, Justice.

Appellants Seban, who were defendants below in an eminent domain proceeding instituted by appellee Dade County, seek reversal of an order of the trial judge refusing to allow them a fee for the services of their attorneys rendered in a prior appeal of the cause to this court in which these appellants and others were successful. See Dade County v. Houk, Fla.1956, 89 So.2d 649. .

The determining question is whether the trial judge had the authority to fix and award a fee for the services of attorneys for property owners rendered in an appeal in eminent domain proceedings taken…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dade County v. BrighamSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
  2. Dade County v. HoukSupreme Court of Florida · 1956

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Ottumwa v. TaylorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
  2. White v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  3. Dade County v. RenedoSupreme Court of Florida · 1962
  4. White v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API