Legal Opinion

Dade County v. Houk

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 23, 1956PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

This cause came on to be heard on the motion of appellees to affirm the judgment appealed from pursuant tó 31 F.S.A. Rule 38 of the rules of this court and it appearing to the court from an examination of the record that said motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument ;

It is accordingly Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that the motion to affirm the judgment appealed from be, and the same is, hereby granted, and the judgment is

Affirmed.

DREW, C. J., and TERRELL, THOMAS and THORNAL,…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jacksonville Express. Auth. v. Henry G. Du Pree Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1959
  2. Cheshire v. State Road DepartmentDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  3. Seban v. Dade CountySupreme Court of Florida · 1958
  4. City of Jacksonville Beach v. Rosalie's Bar, Inc., Circuit Court of the 4th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Duval County1964
  5. DIVISION OF BOND FINANCE OF DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES v. RaineyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API