Legal Opinion

White v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 11, 1975No. SC 974PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MADDOX, Justice.

“Attorney’s fees and expenses are not embraced within just compensation for land taken by eminent domain.”

This short, concise and direct quote, taken from Dohany v. Rogers, 281 U.S. 362, 368, 50 S.Ct. 299, 302, 74 L.Ed. 904 (1930), sustains the trial court’s judgment that attorneys’ fees and litigation expenses are not recoverable costs in an eminent domain proceeding.

The landowners, after a judgment was entered in circuit court based upon a jury verdict, filed a motion with the trial judge asking him to direct the circuit clerk to tax $35,000 as costs to pay their attorneys’…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Dohany v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. State v. RothWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Bowers v. Fulton CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
  5. County of Los Angeles v. OrtizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Osborn v. RileySupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  2. Jones v. Regions BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  3. Hogan v. Alabama Power Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1977
  4. Solko v. State Roads Commission of State Highway AdministrationCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  5. Parker v. Jefferson County CommissionSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API