City of Ottumwa v. Taylor
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtGarfield, J.
This certiorari action instituted in this court presents the question whether defendant-judge of the district court exceeded “his proper jurisdiction or otherwise acted illegally”, within the meaning of rule 306, Rules of Civil Procedure, in allowing to the condemnee in eminent domain pro ceedings fees of.$1325 and expenses of $43.40 for expert witnesses as part of “all costs occasioned by the appeal, including reasonable attorney fees to be taxed by the court,” under section 472.33, Code, 1958. We hold defendant acted illegally in the sense here used in mailing the allowances.
The City of…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Dohany v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Dade County v. BrighamSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
- Turner v. Zip Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1954
- Hohl v. Board of Education of Poweshiek CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1959
- Detroit Edison Co. v. JanoszMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- City of Riverdale, Iowa v. Allen Diercks, Marie Randol, and Tammie PictonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
- Leadville Water Co. v. Parkville Water DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
- County of Los Angeles v. OrtizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Iowa Department of Transportation v. SowardSupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
- State v. RogersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.