Scottish Bank v. Atkinson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtRodmaN, J.
We held, when this litigation was here before, that equalization of advancements could only be effected from property owned by Mrs. Emily P. Bennett at the time of her death. The evidence taken by the referee was for the purpose of ascertaining what property, if any, was so owned. The case depends on the ownership of 140 shares of stock in Avant-Sholar, Inc.
Judge Carr found as a fact: “On 31 October 1949, Mrs. Emily P. Bennett signed the transfer on the certificates of stock then owned by her and registered in her name on the books of the corporation, representing 140 shares of the capital…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bunn v. . ToddSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- Peek v. ShookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Allen v. . AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Zollicoffer v. . ZollicofferSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- Burton v. . StyersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Early v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1969
- Smith v. PerdueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Fesmire v. FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK OF NCSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Brown v. WhitleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- Davis v. FlynnCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.