Legal Opinion

Peek v. Shook

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 28, 1951No. 100PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEbviw, J.

The defendant bases his objection to the admission of the evidence given by the plaintiff in person upon the statute now codified as G.S. 8-51.

This statute does not render the testimony of a witness incompetent in any case unless these four questions require an affirmative answer :

1. Is the witness (a) a party to the action, or (b) a person interested in the event of the action, or (e) a person from, through or under whom such a party or interested person derives his interest or title?

2. Is the witness testifying (a) in his own behalf or interest, or (b) in behalf of the party succeeding to…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Bunn v. . ToddSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  2. Barbee v. . BarbeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  3. Boyd v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  4. Woodhouse v. . Simmons, Ex'r.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
  5. Dunn v. Currie.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Bryant v. KellySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Godwin v. Wachovia Bank & Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  3. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co., N.A. v. RubishSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Hodges v. HodgesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  5. Hardee v. HardeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API