Legal Opinion

Allen v. . Allen

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 23, 1938PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.

There are 182 assignments of error the mere statement of which consumes 38 pages of the record. As these multitudinous assignments are not grouped it is with considerable difficulty that we are able to fish out of the record the pertinent questions of law the plaintiffs seek to present for determination on this appeal. It is clear, however, that whether there was a division of the lands belonging to T. W. and E. J. Allen among their children is not the decisive feature of the case. Here tbe controlling factor is the fact that a deed was tendered to J. W. Allen and Hester Hendricks for a tract…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Helsabeck v. . DoubSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  2. Burton v. . StyersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  3. Hall v. HollomanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  4. Vannoy v. . StaffordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Whitacre Partnership v. Biosignia, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  2. State v. FoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  3. Thompson v. SolesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Erickson v. StarlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. Estate of GrossmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API