Addiego v. Hill
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SIMS, J.
Defendants, who unsuccessfully appealed from a judgment which granted the plaintiffs’ prayer for specific performance of a preemption agreement for the purchase from defendants of stock of a closely held corporation (see Addiego v. Hill (1968) 268 Cal.App.2d 280 [73 Cal.Rptr. 901]), now appeal from a post-judgment mandatory injunction which ordered them to carry out the judgment.
*456They contend that the trial court erred in the following particulars: (1) in ordering them to transfer their stock for the full amount of the purchase price fixed in the judgment without either…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ellis v. MihelisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Abrams v. MotterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Heinlen v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879
- Lawrence v. ShuttCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Addiego v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Negro v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Abadjian v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Negro v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2014