Legal Opinion

Addiego v. Hill

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 12, 1971No. Civ. No. 27344PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SIMS, J.

Defendants, who unsuccessfully appealed from a judgment which granted the plaintiffs’ prayer for specific performance of a preemption agreement for the purchase from defendants of stock of a closely held corporation (see Addiego v. Hill (1968) 268 Cal.App.2d 280 [73 Cal.Rptr. 901]), now appeal from a post-judgment mandatory injunction which ordered them to carry out the judgment.

*456They contend that the trial court erred in the following particulars: (1) in ordering them to transfer their stock for the full amount of the purchase price fixed in the judgment without either…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ellis v. MihelisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Abrams v. MotterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. Heinlen v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Lawrence v. ShuttCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Addiego v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Negro v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. Abadjian v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. Negro v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API