Legal Opinion
Abadjian v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 17, 1985No. B010624PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WOODS, P. J.
This original proceeding in mandate was commenced by eight gasoline station franchisees who seek to vacate an order of respondent court that compels them to pay rent to their franchisor during the pendency of their underlying action (to compel sale of the franchised premises to them under a preemptive purchase right) and the consolidated unlawful detainer action by the franchisor.
The determinative issue upon which the alternative writ issued is whether a franchisee who formally stipulated to pay rent during the pendency of his action to enforce a preemptive purchase right…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ellis v. MihelisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Gonzales v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Erich v. GranoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Heinlen v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879
- Maron v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Florham Park Chevron, Inc. v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1988
- Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. BerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- St. Paul Mercury Insurance v. Frontier Pacific InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- People v. Superior Court (Brent)California Court of Appeal · 1992
- MinCal Consumer Law Group v. Carlsbad Police DepartmentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.