Legal Opinion

Universal Modular Structures, Inc. v. Forrest

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided June 19, 1986No. 56,432, 58,320PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rees, J.:

In this action, plaintiff Universal Modular Systems, Inc., (UMS) seeks to remove a cloud on title to realty created by defendant Mary K. Forrest’s judgment lien, which lien arose by reason of a default judgment secured by Forrest against a third party in an underlying action. UMS appeals a district court order (1) barring its collateral attack on the ground Forrest’s failure to comply with the notice requirement of Supreme Court Rule 118, 235 Kan. cv, did not render void her default judgment; and (2) holding that Forrest’s judgment lien was not invalidated by virtue of her default…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Winfield Associates, Inc. v. W. L. StonecipherCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
  2. Automatic Feeder Co. v. TobeySupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  3. Stevenson v. TurnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  4. Garnett State Savings Bank v. TushSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  5. Becker v. RootheSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bazine State Bank v. Pawnee Production Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1989
  2. Producers Equipment Sales, Inc. v. ThomasonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1991
  3. Continental Coal, Inc. v. CunninghamDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2007
  4. Wellsville Bank v. SutterbyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1988
  5. First National Bank v. Sankey Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API