Legal Opinion

Firstmark Capital Corp. v. Hempel Financial Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 3, 1988No. 87-5884PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUG, Circuit Judge:

Nancy Hempel (“Mrs. Hempel”) appeals the district court’s judgment imposing on her liability as a corporations’ alter ego in the amount of $854,991.94. The case was tried without a jury, and the district court’s findings of fact are not disputed. The principal question presented is whether alter ego liability can be imposed on a spouse on the basis that she owns a community property interest in the stock of a corporation and received benefits from her husband’s abuse of the corporate structure. We hold that more is required.

*93I.

FACTS

Mrs. Hempel was married to Bruce Hem-pel…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McLINN v. FJORDCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  2. Stark v. CokerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Wood v. Elling Corp.California Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Arnold v. BrowneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. Parola v. WeinbergerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. In re Packaged Seafood Products Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2017
  2. Tatung Co. v. Shu Tze HsuDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2016
  3. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd.District Court, C.D. California · 2003
  4. Buckley v. AbuzirAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
  5. Conde v. SensaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2017

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API