Firstmark Capital Corp. v. Hempel Financial Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HUG, Circuit Judge:
Nancy Hempel (“Mrs. Hempel”) appeals the district court’s judgment imposing on her liability as a corporations’ alter ego in the amount of $854,991.94. The case was tried without a jury, and the district court’s findings of fact are not disputed. The principal question presented is whether alter ego liability can be imposed on a spouse on the basis that she owns a community property interest in the stock of a corporation and received benefits from her husband’s abuse of the corporate structure. We hold that more is required.
*93I.
FACTS
Mrs. Hempel was married to Bruce Hem-pel…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McLINN v. FJORDCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Stark v. CokerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Wood v. Elling Corp.California Supreme Court · 1977
- Arnold v. BrowneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Parola v. WeinbergerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- In re Packaged Seafood Products Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2017
- Tatung Co. v. Shu Tze HsuDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2016
- Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd.District Court, C.D. California · 2003
- Buckley v. AbuzirAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
- Conde v. SensaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2017
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.