Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd.
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT SHARMAN NETWORKS LTD.’S AND DEFENDANT LEF INTERACTIVE’S MOTIONS TO DISMISS
WILSON, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs bring these actions for copyright infringement under 17 U.S.C. §§ 501, et seq. The Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331. Defendant Shar-man Networks Ltd. moves to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, lack of subject matter jurisdiction, improper venue, and forum non conveniens. See Fed. Rules Civ. P. Rules 12(b)(1), (2), and (3). Defendant LEF Interactive Pty Ltd. moves to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction only.
For the…
2Cases cited75 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Allstar Marketing Group, LLC v. Your Store Online, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2009
- Lans v. Adduci Mastriani & Schaumberg L.L.P.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Amini Innovation Corp. v. JS IMPORTS INC.District Court, C.D. California · 2007
- FutureSelect Portfolio Management, Inc. v. Tremont Group Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Northbrook Digital, LLC v. Vendio Services, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2008
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.