Legal Opinion

Drangstviet v. Auto-Owners Insurance

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided June 27, 1995No. 95-0053PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCane, P.J.

Jane Drangstviet, representative of the estate of Dale Moffet (hereinafter the estate), appeals a summary judgment in favor of Auto-Owners Insurance Company. The estate contends that Moffet's estate falls within the language "owned and occupied by the insured property as a dwelling" under the valued policy statute, § 632.05(2), Stats. Because we conclude that the estate did not occupy the insured property as a dwelling, the statute is inapplicable. Thus, we affirm the trial court.

BACKGROUND

The facts are undisputed. Doctor Dale Moffet owned property consisting of a house, a clinic and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Green Spring Farms v. KerstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  2. In Interest of PAKWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. Hoa Duc PhamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Kloes v. Eau Claire Cavalier Baseball Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
  5. D.S. v. Racine CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Seider v. O'CONNELLWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
  3. Cambier v. Integrity Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2007
  4. Seider v. MusserCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998
  5. Johnson v. Mt. Morris Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API