Legal Opinion

Cambier v. Integrity Mutual Insurance

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided July 26, 2007No. 2006AP3112PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVergeront, J.

¶ 1. The dispositive issue on this appeal is whether, under Wis. Stat. § 632.05(2) (2005-06), 1 the insured occupied "primarily as a dwelling" a cabin that he owned that was damaged by fire. The circuit court concluded that the undisputed facts showed that the insured, Todd Cambier, did meet this requirement and was entitled to the policy limits as provided in the statute. The insurer, Integrity Mutual Insurance Company, appeals the summary judgment entered against it.

¶ 2. We conclude that the insured did not occupy the cabin primarily as a dwelling because, based on the undisputed facts, at…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Green Spring Farms v. KerstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Seider v. O'CONNELLWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Drangstviet v. Auto-Owners InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
  5. Kohnen v. Wisconsin Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. ZienCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2008
  2. American Transmission Co. v. Dane CountyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2009
  3. Wickman v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2009
  4. Jackson County Department of Health & Human Services v. Susan H.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2010
  5. Dawson v. Town of JacksonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API