Legal Opinion

Seider v. Musser

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided September 17, 1998No. 98-1223PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVergeront, J.

Richard and Jean Seider appeal from a judgment dismissing their complaint for a declaratory judgment that Wis. Adm. Code § INS 4.01(2)(e) is invalid because it conflicts with § 632.05(2), Stats., the "valued policy law." That statute establishes the policy limits as the amount of loss whenever insured real property "owned and occupied by the insured as a dwelling" is wholly destroyed. Section 632.05(2). The administrative regulation makes this statute inapplicable when there is a "policy insuring real property any part of which is used for commercial (non-dwelling) purposes other than on an…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kelley Co., Inc. v. MarquardtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. SampleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Swatek v. County of DaneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  4. GMAC Mortgage Corp. v. GisvoldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Awve v. Physicians Insurance Company of Wisconsin, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Seider v. O'CONNELLWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Janssen v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
  3. State v. CampbellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  4. Capoun Revocable Trust v. AnsariCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000
  5. Seider v. O'CONNELLWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API