Legal Opinion
State v. Leeman
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided December 20, 1977No. 2 CA-CR 1137PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HATHAWAY, Judge.
Appellee was charged with one count of theft by embezzlement in violation of *350A.R.S. § 13-682, as amended, and his subsequent motion to dismiss, attacking the statute as violative of the equal protection clause of the United States and Arizona Constitutions, was granted. The state appeals.
A.R.S. § 13-682, as amended, provides in pertinent part:
“A. A person is guilty of theft by embezzlement who:
4. Has leased or rented personal property, and who fraudulently fails to return such personal property, to the lessor within ten days after the lessor has made written demand by…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Turner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Casey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- State v. ScofieldCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
- State v. HaremzaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
- State Ex Rel. Berger v. SUPERIOR COURT, IN AND FOR COUNTY OF MARICOPAArizona Supreme Court · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. LeemanArizona Supreme Court · 1978