Legal Opinion

State v. Leeman

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1978No. 4191-PRPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GORDON, Justice:

Rudolph Leeman was charged with theft by embezzlement of rented or leased property, a violation of A.R.S. § 13-682. Prior to his trial, Leeman moved to dismiss the charge, alleging the statute to be violative of the equal protection clause of United States and Arizona Constitutions. The trial court granted the motion and the state appealed the ruling. Although the Court of Appeals disagreed with Leeman’s reasoning, it still found the statute to be unconstitutional. The Court of Appeals concluded the statute violated Art. 2, § 18 of the Arizona Constitution which provides:…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. United States v. KrasSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Ortwein v. SchwabSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Ortwein v. SchwabSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. ThompsonArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. WatkinsArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. LaudeWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. LycettCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  5. State v. ForresterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API