Legal Opinion
Merrick v. New York Subways Advertising Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 2, 1958PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFrederick Backer, J.
Defendant moves to dismiss the complaint and the causes of action pursuant to section 241 of the *457Civil Practice Act and subdivision 4 of rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice. Alternative relief is also sought pursuant to rule 103 of the Rules of Civil Practice to strike from the complaint certain stated paragraphs or specified portions thereof.
At the outset and for the purpose of presenting a ready bird’s-eye picture of the nature of the litigation it may be generally stated that plaintiffs sue upon a contract to secure specific performance of certain advertising space they contracted for…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Routledge v. . Worthington Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Gerseta Corp. v. Silk Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
- Gutta-Percha & Rubber Manufacturing Co. v. HolmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
- John D. Park & Sons Co. v. National Wholesale Druggists' Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
- Nasmie Construction Co. v. QuasmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- American Electric Power Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1976
- Granite Partners, L.P. v. Bear, Stearns & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Millard v. Newmark & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
- IMG FRAGRANCE BRANDS, LLC v. Houbigant, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Arlen of Nanuet, Inc. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.