Legal Opinion

Nasmie Construction Co. v. Quasman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1925PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order granting motion to strike out the 6th paragraph of defendant Quasman’s answer reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. The power of the court to strike out irrelevant and redundant matter should be exercised with caution. To authorize the exercise of the court’s discretion in that respect, the irrelevancy must be clear and the redundancy unquestioned; and it also must appear that the moving party is aggrieved thereby. (Savage Realty Co. v. Lust, 203 App. Div. 55; Wayte v. Bowker Chemical Co., 196 id. 665.) Kelly, P. J.,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Savage Realty Co. v. LustAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Merrick v. New York Subways Advertising Co.New York Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Zirn v. BradleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
  3. Hafnia Ham Co. v. Cheese Importing Co.New York Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Broderick v. HorvattNew York Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Greenberg v. Nusbaum's Department Store, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1962

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API