Legal Opinion
American Electric Power Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 19, 1976No. 74 Civ. 1521PublishedCited by 117 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT L. CARTER, District Judge.
Defendant Westinghouse Electric Corporation (“Westinghouse”) has moved, pursuant to Rule 56, F.R.Civ.P., for summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ claims in their entirety and awarding Westinghouse judgment on Count I of its counterclaim. In the alternative, Westinghouse has moved for partial summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ claims for consequential damages. Plaintiffs have moved, pursuant to Rule 15(a), F.R.Civ.P., for leave to amend their complaint and their reply to defendant’s counterclaim.
I
Facts
Beginning in September, 1965, plaintiff…
2Cases cited73 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Annette Heyman v. Commerce and Industry Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by117 opinions
- Chemical Bank v. Arthur Andersen & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Clark v. International Harvester Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1978
- S. M. Wilson & Company v. Smith International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Canal Electric Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- Cayuga Harvester, Inc. v. Allis-Chalmers Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.