Legal Opinion

Naher v. Farmer

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1910No. 8948PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Tallman, J., entered December 7, 1909, upon findings in favor of the defendants, in an action of ejectment, after a trial before the court without a jury.

1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.

This action was brought to recover possession of a strip of land, a little more than seven feet wide across the end of lot 3, block 36, supplemental plat of A. Pontius addition to Seattle. The allegations of the complaint were denied, and the defendants pleaded title by adverse possession. The trial court found in favor of the defendants, and entered a decree accordingly. The plaintiffs have appealed.-

The facts are as follows: Lots 3 and 4, of the block named, are located about the center of the block. The two lots join end to end, and extend east and west through the block. There is no…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McCormick v. SorensonWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Weingarten v. ShurtleffWashington Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  2. State v. MorrisWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  3. El Cerrito, Inc. v. RyndakWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Skansi v. NovakWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  5. State v. EmersonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API