Legal Opinion
State v. Kelly
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 18, 2006No. AC 26001PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DiPENTIMA, J.
The acquittee, Joel C. Kelly, challenges the order of the trial court committing him to the jurisdiction of the psychiatric security review board (board) for a period not to exceed eight years. He seeks plain error review of his unpreserved claim that in ordering commitment pursuant to General Statutes § 17a-582, the court failed to apply the statutorily mandated standards of General Statutes § 17a-580. We remand the matter for articulation.
In February, 2004, the acquittee was charged with kidnapping in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-94 (a),…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- State v. ReaganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- State v. GuckianConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- State v. GuckianSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. ChemlenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
- State v. DyousConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020
- State v. KellyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007