Sorenson v. Bakken Investments, LLC
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Tufte, Justice.
[¶ 1] William Everett and 14 others (collectively “Everett • defendants”) appeal from a judgment quieting title to certain McKenzie County mineral interests in Craig and Barbara Sorenson against the Everett defendants. We affirm because collateral estoppel bars the Everett defendants’ arguments in this case.
I
[¶ 2] In 2010 the Sorensons sued the Everett defendants and others to quiet title to certain mineral interests, claiming they had succeeded to ownership of those interests because the interests were abandoned under the Termination of Mineral Interest Act, N.D.C.C. ch.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hofsommer v. Hofsommer Excavating, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Gajewski v. BratcherNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
- Hamilton v. WollNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Paulson v. PaulsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Pautz v. T.H.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Puklich v. PuklichNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
- Bride v. Trinity Hosp.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- Ayling v. SensNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- Candee v. CandeeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- Molbert v. KornkvenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.