Legal Opinion

Candee v. Candee

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 2017No. 20170028PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tufte, Justice.

[¶1] Keith Candee appeals from a summary judgment granted to his parents, Lyla and Douglas Candee, awarding them an $884,508.83 deficiency’.judgment following foreclosure of properties in California and North Dakota. We reverse and remand, concluding California law bars a deficiency judgment in this case as a matter of law.

I

[¶2] Keith Candée and Lyla and Douglas Candee executed a settlement agreement and mutual release of claims in 2013 relating to earlier disputes between the parties about the management of,their family assets, Under the settlement agreement, Keith Candee…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cardon v. Cotton Lane Holdings, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1992
  2. CITIBANK, NA v. ErricoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
  3. Bank of America, N.A. v. RobertsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. Felton v. WestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Coppola v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Candee v. CandeeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Candee v. CandeeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Candee v. CandeeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Candee v. CandeeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Corval Constructors, Inc. v. Tesoro Refining & Marketing Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API