Legal Opinion

Salt Lake City v. Wilson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1915No. 2675PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Third District; Hon. F. C. Loofbourow, Judge. Action by Salt Lake City, a municipal corporation, against M. E. Wilson. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.

Salt Lake City, hereafter called appellant, commenced this action in the City Court of Salt Lake City against the defendant to recover a road poll tax amounting to two dollars. The The action was based upon a city ordinance, which was approved June 15,1909. The ordinance in question was adopted pursuant to Chapter 118, Laws Utah 1909, which was approved March- 23, 1909, and went into effect May 12th of that year. The ordinance is fully set forth in the complaint, together with the notice that was served on the defendant by the ‘' street supervisor ’ ’ of Salt Lake City! The defendant demurred…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State ex. rel. Curtis v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
  2. Edler v. EdwardsUtah Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Marioneaux v. CutlerUtah Supreme Court · 1907
  4. City of Faribault v. MisenerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1874
  5. Multnomah County v. SlikerOregon Supreme Court · 1881

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Breedlove v. SuttlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Utah State Fair Ass'n v. GreenUtah Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Gregory v. ShurtleffUtah Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Riggins v. District Court of Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Baker v. Department of RegistrationUtah Supreme Court · 1931

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API