Legal Opinion

Gregory v. Shurtleff

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 2013No. 20110277, 20110473PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice DURHAM,

opinion of the Court:

INTRODUCTION

{1 Appellants brought suit to enjoin the enforcement of a law, claiming that the law violated the state constitution in four respects. The district court dismissed the first two claims and rejected the second two claims on summary judgment. On appeal, we consider whether Appellants had standing to bring these claims in the first place. We hold that, although they lacked the personal injury required for traditional standing, Appellants had public-interest standing to bring the first two claims. We also hold that they did not have standing to…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. ShewardOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Dague v. Piper Aircraft Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Legislature v. EuCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Lansing Schools Education Ass'n v. Lansing Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
  5. People v. MungoMichigan Supreme Court · 2009

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Bagley v. BagleyUtah Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. RobertsUtah Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Rupp v. MoffoUtah Supreme Court · 2015
  4. McKitrick v. GibsonUtah Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Haik v. JonesUtah Supreme Court · 2018

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API