Marioneaux v. Cutler
Utah Supreme Court
Application of Thomas Marioneaux for a writ of mandate against John O. Cutler, Governor, and others, constituting the state board of examiners, to compel defendants to allow petitioner’s claim as a district judge for mileage. APPELLANT'S POINTS. The Constitution declares that the subject of contemplated legislation shall be clearly expressed in the titlp. No one is required to look beyond the title to ascertain whether a bill contains a subject not expressed in the title.
Read the full summary
Application of Thomas Marioneaux for a writ of mandate against John O. Cutler, Governor, and others, constituting the state board of examiners, to compel defendants to allow petitioner’s claim as a district judge for mileage. APPELLANT'S POINTS. The Constitution declares that the subject of contemplated legislation shall be clearly expressed in the titlp. No one is required to look beyond the title to ascertain whether a bill contains a subject not expressed in the title. For if it does contain a subject not expressed in the title, the law is well settled that as to such subject, the act will…
1Opinion of the CourtErick, J.
This is an original application to this court for a writ of mandate. The applicant, hereinafter designated “petitioner,” in substance alleges that from January, 1901, to January, 1905, he was the duly qualified and acting district judge of the Eifth judicial district of this state; that *478between April 4, 1903, and November 18, 1904, be actually and necessarily traveled in tbe performance of bis official duties a certain number of miles, setting forth tbe dates, distances, and amounts, aggregating’tbe sum of $416.10; tbat on tbe 21st day of August, 1905, be duly presented to John C. Cutler,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Johnson v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Matter Appl'n Mayor, Etc., of City of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Mill v. BrownUtah Supreme Court · 1907
- Mills v. CharletonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
- Winters v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Knight v. Chicago Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1945
- Utah State Fair Ass'n v. GreenUtah Supreme Court · 1926
- Gregory v. ShurtleffUtah Supreme Court · 2013
- Bateman v. Board of ExaminersUtah Supreme Court · 1958
- Riggins v. District Court of Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1935
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.